Phenotype IDPhenotype NameScoringvariation type#Samples
AT_P_11Emoy*All interactions were scored specifically on first true leaves as compatible, incompatible or intermediate depending on the consistency of presence / absence of sporangiophores determined on 5-10 seedlings of each genotype with three independent replicationsbinary76
AT_P_8Seed DormancyNumber of days of seed dry storage required to reach 50% germination, or DSDS50 value (Alonso-Blanco et al., 2003). The measurement for each genotype was calculated as the average value across all available replicatescontinuous83
AT_P_12Hiks1All interactions were scored specifically on first true leaves as compatible, incompatible or intermediate depending on the consistency of presence / absence of sporangiophores determined on 5-10 seedlings of each genotype with three independent replicationsbinary84
AT_P_33avrRpm1Following inoculation of two leaves per plant with 0.1 ml of 10 -8 cfu/ml bacteria in 10 mM MgSO4 buffer using a blunt-tipped syringe, leaf collapse was scored at 20 hrs and again at 24 hrs after inoculation. A positive score at either time point was deemed a hypersensitive responsebinary84
AT_P_10Emwa1All interactions were scored specifically on first true leaves as compatible, incompatible or intermediate depending on the consistency of presence / absence of sporangiophores determined on 5-10 seedlings of each genotype with three independent replicationsbinary85
AT_P_9Emco5All interactions were scored specifically on first true leaves as compatible, incompatible or intermediate depending on the consistency of presence / absence of sporangiophores determined on 5-10 seedlings of each genotype with three independent replicationsbinary86
AT_P_13Noco2All interactions were scored specifically on first true leaves as compatible, incompatible or intermediate depending on the consistency of presence / absence of sporangiophores determined on 5-10 seedlings of each genotype with three independent replicationsbinary87
AT_P_35avrBFollowing inoculation of two leaves per plant with 0.1 ml of 10 -8 cfu/ml bacteria in 10 mM MgSO4 buffer using a blunt-tipped syringe, leaf collapse was scored at 20 hrs and again at 24 hrs after inoculation. A positive score at either time point was deemed a hypersensitive responsebinary87
AT_P_34avrRpt2Following inoculation of two leaves per plant with 0.1 ml of 10 -8 cfu/ml bacteria in 10 mM MgSO4 buffer using a blunt-tipped syringe, leaf collapse was scored at 20 hrs and again at 24 hrs after inoculation. A positive score at either time point was deemed a hypersensitive responsebinary89
AT_P_182Hypocotyl lengthAfter seven days growth under the photocycle and thermocycle treatment,plants were flattened directly on the agar and imaged on a flatbed scanner. Hypocotyl lengths were determined using NIH Imagecontinuous89
AT_P_32avrPphBFollowing inoculation of two leaves per plant with 0.1 ml of 10 -8 cfu/ml bacteria in 10 mM MgSO4 buffer using a blunt-tipped syringe, leaf collapse was scored at 20 hrs and again at 24 hrs after inoculation. A positive score at either time point was deemed a hypersensitive responsebinary90
AT_P_14Li7Lithium concentrations in leaves, grown in soil. Elemental analysis was performed with an ICP-MS (PerkinElmer). Sample normalized to calculated weights as described in Baxter et al., 2008continuous93
AT_P_15B11Boron concentrations in leaves, grown in soil. Elemental analysis was performed with an ICP-MS (PerkinElmer). Sample normalized to calculated weights as described in Baxter et al., 2008continuous93
AT_P_16Na23Sodium concentrations in leaves, grown in soil. Elemental analysis was performed with an ICP-MS (PerkinElmer). Sample normalized to calculated weights as described in Baxter et al., 2008continuous93
AT_P_17Mg25Magnesium concentrations in leaves, grown in soil. Elemental analysis was performed with an ICP-MS (PerkinElmer). Sample normalized to calculated weights as described in Baxter et al., 2008continuous93
AT_P_18P31Phosphorus concentrations in leaves, grown in soil. Elemental analysis was performed with an ICP-MS (PerkinElmer). Sample normalized to calculated weights as described in Baxter et al., 2008continuous93
AT_P_19S34Sulfur concentrations in leaves, grown in soil. Elemental analysis was performed with an ICP-MS (PerkinElmer). Sample normalized to calculated weights as described in Baxter et al., 2008continuous93
AT_P_20K39Potassium concentrations in leaves, grown in soil. Elemental analysis was performed with an ICP-MS (PerkinElmer). Sample normalized to calculated weights as described in Baxter et al., 2008continuous93
AT_P_21Ca43Calcium concentrations in leaves, grown in soil. Elemental analysis was performed with an ICP-MS (PerkinElmer). Sample normalized to calculated weights as described in Baxter et al., 2008continuous93
AT_P_22Mn55Manganese concentrations in leaves, grown in soil. Elemental analysis was performed with an ICP-MS (PerkinElmer). Sample normalized to calculated weights as described in Baxter et al., 2008continuous93
AT_P_23Fe56Iron concentrations in leaves, grown in soil. Elemental analysis was performed with an ICP-MS (PerkinElmer). Sample normalized to calculated weights as described in Baxter et al., 2008continuous93
AT_P_24Co59Cobalt concentrations in leaves, grown in soil. Elemental analysis was performed with an ICP-MS (PerkinElmer). Sample normalized to calculated weights as described in Baxter et al., 2008continuous93
AT_P_25Ni60Nickel concentrations in leaves, grown in soil. Elemental analysis was performed with an ICP-MS (PerkinElmer). Sample normalized to calculated weights as described in Baxter et al., 2008continuous93
AT_P_26Cu65Copper concentrations in leaves, grown in soil. Elemental analysis was performed with an ICP-MS (PerkinElmer). Sample normalized to calculated weights as described in Baxter et al., 2008continuous93
AT_P_27Zn66Zinc concentrations in leaves, grown in soil. Elemental analysis was performed with an ICP-MS (PerkinElmer). Sample normalized to calculated weights as described in Baxter et al., 2008continuous93